Dogs provide friendship to thousands of Pasadena residents, but unfortunately, some animals attack and cause serious injuries. The rules determining when a dog owner is liable for the costs of those injuries varies across the country, but Texas uses the one-bite rule. This means plaintiffs must prove that the dog’s owner had prior knowledge the animal was dangerous or violent.
Due to the complexity of dog bite claims, victims should consider contacting a personal injury lawyer to help them pursue compensation from the liable owner or their insurance company. Paying for medical bills on your own can put a large burden on your family, but a Pasadena dog bite lawyer can help you stand up against the insurance companies and seek the justice you deserve.
The One-Bite Rule in Pasadena
Pasadena does not have a dedicated dog bite statute, so it is necessary to look to the courts to determine when a dog owner is liable following an attack. A 1974 ruling in Marshall v. Ranne still dictates when a dog owner is responsible for the actions of their animals.
In this case, the court specifically upholds the one-bite rule, meaning victims can only collect compensation if they can prove the owner knew of the animal’s violent tendencies and was negligent in allowing the attack to occur. Evidence of a violent past usually includes a previous attack or classification as dangerous by a city organization. A Pasadena dog bite attorney could gather evidence of the animal’s past to pursue claims against negligent dog owners.
Proving that the Dog Owner was Negligent and Liable
Once a plaintiff establishes that the defendant knew or should have known about the violent tendencies of the animal, they must prove that the defendant was negligent in allowing the attack to happen. A plaintiff can prove the defendant’s negligence by showing that:
- The owner allowed the animal to run without a leash
- The owner did not crate the animal during an invited visit
- The owner did not properly fence the animal within their property and the animal got loose
To reduce their liability for an attack, dog owners and defense counsel may argue that the plaintiff’s own actions contributed to the attack. For example, they may claim that the victim goaded or teased the animal or was a trespasser on private property. A Pasadena dog attack lawyer can fight to prove that a dog owner’s negligence was the sole cause of the bite.
Let a Pasadena Dog Bite Lawyer Handle Your Claim
The laws in Pasadena make it difficult for victims of dog bites to collect compensation for their losses. Many unrepresented plaintiffs do not understand the one-bite rule or become discouraged at the idea of filing a claim. However, if you were injured by a vicious dog and now face medical bills, you may need relief in the form of a settlement or compensation package.
A Pasadena dog bite attorney can gather the evidence needed to pursue your claim and measure your losses. Let Haines Law stand up to the negligent dog owner and their insurance company in pursuit of the compensation you deserve. Contact our office today to schedule a consultation and start working on your claim.